Minimum a 1000 per PERSON, nobody living in misery anymore.
Beautiful numbers of economic value that prove some points of humanitarian value.
In one of the great and magnificent countries, in a recent year, all taxpayers reported earnings of 9 trillions.
(in adjusted gross income, no matter what actually is, IT WON'T CHANGE THE ESSENCE OF THE CONCLUSIONS TO BE DRAWN)
If one declares without proof that EVERY PERSON on its soil must have a MINIMUM income of 1000 per month, about 100 kg or 220 lbs of mean quality red meat (that is 3 member household 3000, 4 member, 4000 etc) it will add up to about 4 trillions, which is less than half the total of 9 trillions. So 5 trillions will be 'available' to be distributed, in the rather usual established manner, to those that now have high and very high income. But, but, but, they also must keep producing the same way they did though, in other words the total production of goods and services, especially goods, mustn't be lower due to this 'redistribution'.
An illustration of this point is the income of top tier athletes. Few sign 5-year, 100 million contracts, because of the supply and demand principle off course, (many teams want them and raise their value) 20 millions a year is a lot of money. In the same team there are other good players that are paid half or 1/3 this money, aaaaaand there are other 'poor' guys that are paid about one million. IF THIS PLAYER WAS PAID 13-15 MILLION HE WOULDN'T GIVE LESS TO HIS TEAM.
Comments
Post a Comment