ASTINA LAY

Beautiful numbers of economic value that  prove some points of humanitarian value. In one of the great and magnificent countries, in a recent year, all taxpayers reported earnings of  9 trillions.   (in adjusted gross income, no matter what actually is, IT WON'T CHANGE THE ESSENCE OF THE CONCLUSIONS TO BE DRAWN) If one declares without proof that EVERY PERSON on its soil must have a MINIMUM income of 1000 per month , about 100 kg or 220 lbs of mean quality red meat (that is 3 member household 3000, 4 member, 4000 etc) it will add up to about 4 trillions , which is less than half the total of 9 trillions. So 5 trillions will be 'available' to be distributed, in the rather usual established manner, to those that now have high and very high income. But, but, but, they also must keep producing the same way they did though, in other words the total production of goods and services, especially goods, mustn't be lower due to this 'redistribution'. An illu...

One of the most irritating social interests is what political practices will be in effect, in 90% of the countries for a great majority of its people. Some want it on the left and some on the right or center, others call their preference conservative, liberal, republican or democratic and some want communism, facism or socialism. Each of these groups await for their moment of (their) truth to find the opportunity to do things the way they prefer, according to their planned policies, temporarily, because if they don't lose the next elections they'll lose the ones after the next. Some times they achieve their goal, following revolutionary military methods, but they also, usually are overthrown by others using the same practices, it's mostly a matter of time. Happy as they are, they say "now we govern" and also most of the time "the others must not talk". The others though talk and  try to demolish them, right after they take the posts.   Why the l...

Observing the social acts of the general population and government practices is of paramount importance for drawing conclusions on the social and humanitarian status of each country. A world army of social observers could do this, ONLY observe and report to the parent organization, at the minimal cost of a couple of dollars/euros per person.                More or less the population density is about  1000 people per square kilometer (0.4 of a square mile), so an observer will be aware of almost everything happening at distances of 500 meters or less if one observer was placed on each square kilometer.                 So then the world army of social observers must be comprised of 1/000th the world's population, recruited from EVERY country at 1/1000th its population, off course. They must be distributed on each country at 1/1000th of its population but composed of observers from each an...

Through salaries the produced wealth is distributed to the people, and salaries are set by the economic principle of supply and demand too, like prices. ANOTHER STRONGER , HUMANLY NATURAL PRINCIPLE IS THAT NO ONE CAN PRODUCE AS MUCH BY HIMSELF AS CAN WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF OTHERS.    employers & employees   EMPLOYERS OWE TO EMPLOYEES AS MUCH AS EMPLOYEES OWE TO THEM FOR THEIR INITIATIVES ON ECONOMIC ENDEAVORS THAT PRODUCE WEALTH . So, really, employers's  part of the produced wealth is what would have produced by themselves, if didn't have assistance, and from the rest they can keep a percentage, say 10-20-30%, for currying more and higher responsibilities and executive guidance. EMPLOYERS KEEP FOR THEMSELVES MORE MAYBE A LOT MORE THAN THEY DESERVE  

4-5 YEARS AGO I WAS THINKING AND SAYING THAT IT'S ABOUT TIME FOR HUMANITY TO CHANGE COURSE, REALLY CHANGE COURSE, BECAUSE ITS POLITICAL SIDE IS STILL A LONG DISTANCE BEHIND ITS SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL, WHICH HAS GIVEN THE HUMAN BEING EVERYTHING IT HAS TO LIVE INFINITE TIMES BETTER THAN BEFORE THE ADVENT OF TECHNOLOGY. THEY EVEN LED HUMANITY OUTSIDE THE EARTHLY ENVIRONMENT WHILE THE POLITICAL SIDE IS JUST OUTSIDE THE CAVES. MOST PROBABLY IF IT WAS NOT FOR TECHNOLOGY TO MAKE LABOR LESS IMPORTANT FOR THE PRODUCTION, THE ARMIES OF THE WORLD WOULD HAVE DEPRIVED THE PEOPLE FROM THE LIBERTIES THAT ENJOY NOW, SO THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN ONE WAR AFTER THE OTHER TO KILL OR CAPTURE. NOW EVERYTHING IS PRODUCED A LOT EASIER AND AMONG THEM FOOD AND CLOTHING. THE HUMAN BEING DESERVES TO HAVE ITS B A S I C N U T R I T I O N A L N E E D S AND C L O T H I N G SATISFIED FOR FREE, BUT WHEN WE SAY BASIC WE REALLY MEAN IT, SO IT WILL BE EAGER TO WORK FOR THE BETTER ONES IN ADDITION OFF COURSE TO A...

Who says that the human being must be left to live in misery, even those who are not as capable, in our technological era of extremely easy production methods of goods and services. I needed to set my goal, its fulfilling, NO PERSON must have MONTHLY income of less than the equivalent of 100 kg (220 lbs) of mean quality red meat per month by 2030. (In all 70 top countries, and from there on, for the rest.) ================================================================= How would you feel if you didn't want to, but your home country moved to another continent because the proponents won the referendum with 51% vs 49% ? This "dramatic" case was purposely chosen to underline the schizophrenic attitude of some to take major decisions when half the people want something and the other half don't. It's against social coherence, the half that "loses" most of the times has the means to sabotage the other half that "wins...